Removed python repos that does not seem fit
Removed:
- coala (Inactive)
- tree-sitter-legesher-python (Inactive)
- Sorting-Algorithms-Visualizer (No issues)
- pythonping (Inactive)
The last commit is three years old. The one and only (!) issue that is labelled "good first issue" has 16 comments, has been opened in 2018, and the last comment is from 2023. This project does not offer good conditions for beginners.
Update data.json: Fixed PyMC entry format in data.json as per guidelines,
- Removed extra blank lines in data.json.
- Updated PyMC entry to follow the required JSON structure.
- Replaced incorrect field names:
- "desc" → "description"
- "url" → "link"
- "tags" → "technologies"
- "beginner-friendly-label" → "label"
- Ensured formatting consistency for proper parsing.
This fixes the requested changes and ensures PyMC is correctly listed as a beginner-friendly repository.
Updated data.json Added PyMC to Python category- Added PyMC, a Python library for Bayesian statistical modeling and probabilistic machine learning.
- The repository is actively maintained and includes 'good first issue' labels for beginners.
- It provides a supportive community and clear contribution guidelines, making it an excellent addition for new contributors.
in Awesome for Beginners
- Added PyMC, a Python library for Bayesian statistical modeling and probabilistic machine learning.
- The repository is actively maintained and includes 'good first issue' labels for beginners.
- It provides a supportive community and clear contribution guidelines, making it an excellent addition for new contributors.
Going against the rules (already) this links to the issues tracker as otherwise it's not immediately clear how to find these. The link is no longer broken though as the link to a query for the label didn't seem to be working.
Re-added the link for the onboarding guide from the original pull request.
The link was pointing to an issue search, which I am working to remove (see commit beforehand).
I moved the two beginner indicative issue labels to the label section and mentioned the use of "Up For Grabs" in the description.
To normalise the user experience, the links should take users to the main page of the repository.
This approach also allows users to gain a better understanding of the context in which they are contributing, including insights into the repository's purpose and the distribution of language usage.
